Comparison of NoSQL Databases—The Best and Most Popular NoSQL Databases.

NoSQL Database Comparison—Best and Most Popular NoSQL Databases

NoSQL databases, often known as non-SQL databases, do not store data in tabular relations like traditional databases do. NoSQL databases are now widely used in big data and real-time web applications created for current web-scale databases. Graphs, key-value, wide columns, and document stores are common data structures.

NoSQL databases can handle vast volumes of unstructured, partially structured, and structured data because they don’t follow a strict format. As a result, engineers will be able to work more quickly. Developers that use NoSQL databases, for example, can push code updates faster than they might with relational databases.

Three of the most popular NoSQL databases on the market are Cassandra, MongoDB, and Apache HBase. Can customize these open-source NoSQL databases to meet specific business requirements. This post will serve as a NoSQL database comparison, comparing MongoDB vs. Cassandra, HBase vs. MongoDB, and Cassandra vs. HBase to assist you in deciding the best NoSQL databases for your organization.

The fundamental distinctions between these top NoSQL databases are discussed in this NoSQL databases list, the benefits and drawbacks of NoSQL, and where NoSQL databases are employed.

Where Are NoSQL Databases Used?

NoSQL is a non-relational Database Management System that does not require a defined schema, as previously stated. NoSQL databases are simple to scale and prevent joins. Distributed data stores with massive data storage requirements are likely to employ NoSQL databases. NoSQL is used by companies such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter for their big data and real-time online services, which collect terabytes of user data daily.

Advantages of NoSQL Databases

The use of NoSQL databases has several advantages. The following are examples of this:

• These databases feature elastic scalability since they are designed to be used with low-cost commodity hardware.
• Big data applications are supported, and NoSQL databases that can handle massive volumes of data are available.
• Dynamic schemas are utilized because NoSQL databases do not require schemas to begin working with data.
• Compatibility with low-cost commodity hardware clusters becomes practical as transaction and data volumes expand, allowing you to process and store more data at a reduced cost.
• Support for auto-sharding allows NoSQL databases to spread data natively and automatically among an arbitrary number of servers without requiring the application to be aware of the server pool composition.

Disadvantages of NoSQL Databases

You should be aware of a few drawbacks to NoSQL databases. NoSQL databases lack the same level of trustworthiness as Relational Databases. They don’t support ACID, for example. Developers will have to write code to support ACID, making their systems more complex. It may limit the number of transactions committed by safe applications.

Because NoSQL isn’t compatible with SQL, you’ll have to use a manual query language, which can slow down and complicate your system. Finally, compared to relational databases, NoSQL databases are newer, implying they’re less stable and typically have fewer features.

1.  Cassandra

Let’s start with Cassandra to begin this open-source NoSQL database comparison. Cassandra is an extensive column store database system that is among the most popular on the market. Cassandra was created for the Facebook Inbox search feature and has since become a popular NoSQL database, owing to its enterprise-grade features. It boosts Cassandra’s availability and scalability, allowing it to manage large amounts of data and provide near-real-time analysis. Cassandra is a Java-based database that supports both asynchronous and synchronous replication. This NoSQL database has a high level of resilience, making it ideal for applications that must be available at all times.

When comparing MongoDB to Cassandra, you’ll see that Cassandra has a masterless “ring” architecture, but MongoDB does not. It means that all nodes in a cluster are considered equally and can use most nodes to form a quorum. Cassandra stores data in columns and rows, just like a typical Relational Database. On the other hand, Cassandra can provide more flexibility by allowing rows to contain different columns and allowing users to adjust the column format.

Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is quite similar to SQL and is reasonably simple to understand for SQL users. As a result, in a Cassandra vs. HBase comparison, Cassandra can provide advanced read, write, and entropy correction methods. It indicates that the cluster is highly dependable and available.

It wouldn’t be a fair NoSQL database comparison if we didn’t discuss the negatives of each of these top NoSQL databases. Because the architecture is distributed, replicas may become inconsistent, which is one of Cassandra’s significant drawbacks. It is because if a node fails, the coordinator node will try to save data in the form of hints. After the failing node is brought online, the coordinator hands off the clues to assist with the repair operation, the coordinator node may be burdened due to this. If a cluster node fails, the coordination node may lose data replicas and experience refusals.

Cassandra performs admirably when the primary key is known, but it may struggle if the key is unknown. It is due to Cassandra’s requirement to scan all nodes in the cluster, which results in significant read latency penalties.

2.  MongoDB

MongoDB is the most widely used document database and one of the most popular database management systems. They built MongoDB to solve the difficulties of agility and scalability that DoubleClick had with providing internet adverts. Kerberos, LDAP, auditing, and on-disk encryption are all included in the MongoDB enterprise edition.

One of MongoDB’s main advantages is that it is a schema-less database that stores data as JSON-like documents. It means MongoDB is adaptable and flexible regarding the types of records it can hold. It also allows for different fields to be used in various texts.

MongoDB uses replica sets with data redundancy and automatic failover features, making it a robust solution for high availability. It ensures that your application can continue to serve even if one of the nodes fails.

MongoDB management tasks, including patching, are tedious and time-consuming unless you choose one of the DBaaS versions. Furthermore, as databases scale, MongoDB suffers from memory hotspots.

3.  Apache HBase

HBase is an open-source distributed database with a large column store built on top of HDFS and incorporates numerous features from Google Bigtable. In-memory operations, Bloom filters, and compression are all included. HBase is a Java-based database that supports external APIs such as Avro, Jython, REST, Thrift, and Scala. HBase provides a standalone version of its database, but it’s primarily used for development purposes rather than production.

HBase can store big data sets, even billions of rows, and deliver analysis quickly since it leverages HDFS as the distributed file system. HBase is a NoSQL database that supports sparse data. It can be hosted/distributed on commodity server hardware, making it cost-effective even when data is scaled to terabytes and petabytes. This distribution adds to one of HBase’s most famous features: automated recovery during failover.

Although HBase and Cassandra are comparable in many aspects, one important distinction is that HBase has a primary-replica architecture. It indicates that it has a single point of failure, as switching from one HMaster to another can take time, resulting in a performance bottleneck. As a result, if you need an always-available system, Cassandra may be the superior choice.

HBase, unlike Cassandra, lacks a query language. As a result, HBase users must use the JRuby-based HBase shell and technologies like Apache Hive to get SQL-like features. Unfortunately, using these technologies may result in a significant amount of lag.

Choosing the Right NoSQL Database

Although MongoDB is one of the most popular NoSQL databases, Cassandra, a vast column database, may be able to provide more excellent query performance. When selecting a NoSQL database, keep in mind the availability of managed DBaaS services, which allow you to delegate database maintenance and management to a third-party source. It frees up the developer’s time to concentrate on the program. HBase is deficient in this area, but MongoDB has developed DBaaS services, such as MongoDB Atlas. HBase is a suitable choice for write-intensive applications with large data sets.

About Enteros

Enteros offers a patented database performance management SaaS platform. It proactively identifies root causes of complex business-impacting database scalability and performance issues across a growing number of clouds, RDBMS, NoSQL, and machine learning database platforms.