Best Practices for SQL Server Performance Tuning
When evaluating the various data set settings, SQL Server settings, coding techniques, and SQL stand-by kinds that can affect the speed, there are a few general guidelines to follow when customizing SQL Server execution to improve exertion and minimize interruptions.
Don’t Assume That Poor SQL Server Availability Is the Cause
Many database administrators and programmers utilize knee-jerk performance troubleshooting when it comes to SQL Server performance tuning query optimization. The primary cause is assumed to be the most common indication of low SQL efficacy, and a tiny bit of study and investigation has been carried out. When this occurs, an attempt to fix the apparent leading cause of SQL slowdowns, but the contingency plans fail, resulting in wasted time and annoyance.

In this instance, it’s usually best to take a mental step back and ask why SQL Server is overwhelming the I/O subsystem. And precisely why SQL Server is performing so many physical reads. There are numerous possible explanations for this, including.
A SQL query plan that is inefficient because of a missing index, implicit conversion, or out-of-date statistics performs an extensive, concurrent table scan. It isn’t using a clustered index. The OS is putting a memory load on the ready queue. There is not enough space to keep the regular “working set” of database pages. When it comes to performance tuning, it’s better to conduct research rather than leap to conclusions.
Determine the Extent of the SQL Software Problem
In SQL Server performance tuning, it’s critical to spell out the scope of the problem. It determines how you’ll investigate what’s going on, what measures you’ll collect, and what contents and execution streamlining technologies you’ll employ. Meanwhile, to no one’s surprise, being instructed to break down put away interaction XYZ that accepts two times as long. Also, it is not the same as being told to tune all long-running test scripts.
Performing the query in Server Manager or Azure Data Studio and observing time, CPU, and IO information will yield executable metrics. Can also use the plan cache to acquire performance measures and can also use it to locate the longest-running stored operations. Various tools, such as the Top SQL capability in Enteros SQL Sentry, can better find the most impactful and resource-intensive operations.
Specify the Objective of Effective SQL Server Configuring
Assuming the degree is adequately expansive, the request might turn out to be greater, requiring the assortment of SQL server performance tuning estimations and database performance after some time before any examination and remediation might start.
Recognize Your Boundaries
Before you begin suggesting or implementing SQL performance tuning modifications, it’s critical to understand what you can and cannot do. Here are a couple of such examples:
- If a vendor created the application, you could not make software updates to boost SQL performance.
- If a vendor created the program, you might not be able to add or alter SQL indexes without violating the vendor’s support contract.
Should Not test SQL Tuning Changes in Production
One of the awful activities while tuning SQL Server execution is to make changes promptly. It can have appalling consequences for the responsibility and business, assuming a change has an enormous adverse significance. It requires the foundation of an unmistakable test/QA climate fit for assessing changes under creation responsibility conditions or as close to them as could be expected. That brings us well to the following point.
Comprehend How Test Compares to Production
If your test framework doesn’t measure up to creation, you may not see a similar change in SQL Server performance tuning execution underway as you, in all actuality, do in the test. Exemplary instances of this include:
- There is a creation framework with specific CPUs and a lower fueled test framework to set aside cash.
- For example, difficulty with much less memory than creation, a different NUMA design, or a lower-rated capacity subsystem.
- Only use a portion of the creation information for testing.
- Test not having the option to recreate the creative responsibility.
SQL Tuning Improvements Should Not Be Tested in Production
One of the worst things to do when tuning SQL Server performance is to make changes immediately in production. It can have disastrous ramifications for the workload and business if a change has a significant negative impact. Also, it necessitates establishing a distinct test/QA environment capable of evaluating changes under production attempt to work or near them as possible. That brings us well to the next point.
Take Descriptive Elements Out of Production
Remove all of the diagnostics once you’ve finished the investigation and reached your SQL performance tuning goal.
SELECT
[ses].[name] AS [Session Name],
CASE
WHEN [xs].[address] IS NOT NULL THEN ‘Running’
ELSE ‘Stopped’
END AS [State],
[xs].[create_time] AS [Start Time]
FROM sys.server_event_sessions AS [ses]
left outer JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions AS [xs]
ON [ses].[name] = [xs].[name]
ORDER BY [State], [Start Time];
About Enteros
Enteros offers a patented database performance management SaaS platform. It proactively identifies root causes of complex business-impacting database scalability and performance issues across many RDBMS, NoSQL, and machine learning database platforms.
The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Enteros Inc. This blog may contain links to the content of third-party sites. By providing such links, Enteros Inc. does not adopt, guarantee, approve, or endorse the information, views, or products available on such sites.
Are you interested in writing for Enteros’ Blog? Please send us a pitch!
RELATED POSTS
Scaling Digital Banking with Confidence: AI SQL and Performance Intelligence by Enteros
- 5 February 2026
- Database Performance Management
Introduction Digital banking has moved from being a competitive differentiator to a baseline expectation. Customers now demand real-time payments, instant account access, personalized financial insights, always-on mobile experiences, and seamless digital onboarding—without delays, downtime, or friction. Behind these experiences lies an increasingly complex technology foundation. Core banking modernization, cloud-native digital platforms, open banking APIs, AI-powered … Continue reading “Scaling Digital Banking with Confidence: AI SQL and Performance Intelligence by Enteros”
Turning Database Performance into Revenue Intelligence: Enteros for US Financial Enterprises
Introduction In the US financial services market, technology performance is no longer just an IT concern—it is a direct driver of revenue, customer trust, and competitive advantage. Banks, fintechs, capital markets firms, insurers, and payments providers all operate in an environment defined by real-time transactions, digital-first customer expectations, regulatory scrutiny, and relentless pressure to improve … Continue reading “Turning Database Performance into Revenue Intelligence: Enteros for US Financial Enterprises”
AI Model–Powered Database Optimization for Real Estate: Performance Management and Cost Attribution with Enteros
- 4 February 2026
- Database Performance Management
Introduction The real estate sector is undergoing a profound digital transformation. Property management platforms, digital leasing systems, smart building technologies, tenant experience apps, AI-driven valuation models, ESG reporting tools, and real-time analytics now form the backbone of modern real estate enterprises. Behind every one of these systems lies a complex database ecosystem—supporting high transaction volumes, … Continue reading “AI Model–Powered Database Optimization for Real Estate: Performance Management and Cost Attribution with Enteros”
Accurate Cost Estimation for Telecom Databases: How Enteros Aligns AIOps and Performance Intelligence
Introduction Telecom organizations are operating at an unprecedented scale. 5G rollouts, digital service platforms, real-time billing systems, subscriber analytics, IoT connectivity, and AI-driven customer engagement have pushed data volumes and transaction complexity to new extremes. Yet while networks continue to modernize, database economics remain poorly understood. Most telecom leaders know their cloud bills are rising. … Continue reading “Accurate Cost Estimation for Telecom Databases: How Enteros Aligns AIOps and Performance Intelligence”