Article
Everyone needs a small toy to play with, so I reasoned: Why not buy a toy that will lower my energy costs? For my home, I consequently ordered a 10.5 kWp photovoltaic system. The system came with an inverted Kostal Pico inverter to ensure that electricity could be used directly by the grid.
Kostal also sells a tool that lets you monitor your electricity production over time. However, why spend money when you can do it yourself using a quick shell script? Most importantly: PostgreSQL
I chose to publish this code because there is so little on the internet that demonstrates how to access Kostal Pico:
#!/bin/sh
KUSER=pvserver
KPASS=pvwr
KIP=192.168.0.201
PGUSER=hs
PGDATABASE=test
SQL=”WITH x AS (SELECT date_trunc(‘hour’, tstamp) AS hour, \
round(avg(v1), 2) source_1, \
round(avg(v2), 2) source_2, \
round(avg(v3), 2) source_3, \
round(avg(v1 + v2 + v3), 2) AS total \
FROM (SELECT *, ‘2013-04-10 05:00:00+02’::timestamptz + (t || ‘seconds’)::interval AS tstamp \
FROM kostal) AS a \
GROUP BY 1) \
SELECT y AS time, source_1, source_2, source_3, total \
FROM generate_series generate_series ((SELECT min(hour) FROM x), (SELECT max(hour) FROM x), ‘1 hour’) AS y \
LEFT JOIN (SELECT * FROM x) AS z \
ON (z.hour = y) \
ORDER BY 1 ; “
wget http://$KUSER:$KPASS@$KIP/LogDaten.dat -O – 2> /dev/null | \
sed ‘1,7d’ | \
sed -e ‘s/[ \t]\+/;/gi’ -e ‘s/^;//g’ | \
grep -v ‘h;’ | \
grep -v ‘POR’ | \
cut -f1,4,9,14 -d ‘;’ – | \
awk ‘BEGIN { print “CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tmp_kostal (t int8, v1 int4, v2 int4, v3 int4); \
COPY tmp_kostal FROM stdin DELIMITER \x27;\x27 ;” }
{ print }
END { print “\\.\n ; \
INSERT INTO kostal SELECT * FROM tmp_kostal EXCEPT SELECT * FROM kostal; ” } \
{ print “”$SQL”” } \
‘ |
psql $PGDATABASE -U $PGUSER
echo “running analysis …”
psql $PGDATABASE -U $PGUSER -c “$SQL”
Kostal Pico provides you with textual data through an unpleasant web interface. Yes, the interface is obscene, and it took some time to understand what those columns meant. The unfortunate thing about it is that the data stream only contains the number of seconds since the system went into production, rather than a real timestamp. If the system has been shut down for maintenance, however, this counter will NOT advance, but I have left this out because it would be too complicated for a prototype to take into account.
We merely fetch the data using wget and pipe it through various processing steps. Here, it’s crucial to note that we must remove some lines and columns in order to convert this into a PostgreSQL-friendly format (in this case, semi-colon separated).
The data in my case will have four columns:
test=# SELECT * FROM kostal ORDER BY t DESC LIMIT 10;
t | v1 | v2 | v3
———+—–+—–+—–
2435059 | 793 | 548 | 651
2434159 | 412 | 285 | 317
2433259 | 309 | 213 | 255
2432359 | 561 | 388 | 454
2431459 | 476 | 330 | 341
2430559 | 423 | 293 | 303
2429659 | 449 | 310 | 348
2428759 | 236 | 163 | 188
2427859 | 136 | 94 | 106
2426959 | 105 | 73 | 83
(10 rows)
The timestamp we have already discussed is the first column in our PostgreSQL table. The following three columns show my three solar fields. Each of those fields will report its production data. To ensure that we can easily run the script repeatedly without destroying anything, we merge the downloaded data into our already-existing table after it has been downloaded. Kostal may not always send all the data it has, but that doesn’t matter because PostgreSQL will persist the data anyhow; all we have to do is fill in the gaps. Because we only receive one row every 15 minutes (making the amount of data in our PostgreSQL table almost irrelevant), our merging process can be a little rudimentary in this case.
investigating a timeseries
Now that we have the timeseries in our database, we can analyze them using some SQL. I added the time the system was started up to the SQL directly to strengthen the code a little. We should undoubtedly calculate that using a windowing function, but in the event that the HTTP request itself fails, the resulting chart would be incorrect.
One problem is that I desired a full timeseries. Meaning: Kostal Pico won’t give us data for this time if there is no production during the night, so we must find a way to fill in the blanks. We accomplish this by outer joining generate_series to our agglomerated data.
The end result is as follows:
2013-04-26 04:00:00+02 | | | |
2013-04-26 05:00:00+02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00
2013-04-26 06:00:00+02 | 113.00 | 84.50 | 60.00 | 257.50
2013-04-26 07:00:00+02 | 1687.75 | 1173.75 | 349.75 | 3211.25
2013-04-26 08:00:00+02 | 2873.00 | 1980.00 | 1098.50 | 5951.50
2013-04-26 09:00:00+02 | 3353.50 | 2306.00 | 1672.75 | 7332.25
2013-04-26 10:00:00+02 | 3539.75 | 2429.00 | 2097.75 | 8066.50
2013-04-26 11:00:00+02 | 3469.50 | 2385.75 | 2377.00 | 8232.25
2013-04-26 12:00:00+02 | 3250.50 | 2233.50 | 2526.50 | 8010.50
2013-04-26 13:00:00+02 | 2823.00 | 1938.50 | 2517.50 | 7279.00
2013-04-26 14:00:00+02 | 2179.00 | 1491.75 | 2346.75 | 6017.50
2013-04-26 15:00:00+02 | 1322.75 | 868.00 | 2041.00 | 4231.75
2013-04-26 16:00:00+02 | 481.25 | 311.25 | 967.50 | 1760.00
2013-04-26 17:00:00+02 | 357.50 | 242.00 | 407.50 | 1007.00
2013-04-26 18:00:00+02 | 438.00 | 301.75 | 408.50 | 1148.25
2013-04-26 19:00:00+02 | 121.50 | 83.25 | 110.50 | 315.25
2013-04-26 20:00:00+02 | 9.50 | 5.00 | 7.00 | 21.50
2013-04-26 21:00:00+02 | | | |
2013-04-26 22:00:00+02 | | | |
A nice production peak can be observed in the early morning. Given that roughly 1/3 of the system’s panels are moving toward the south and 1/3 are moving toward the east, this is to be expected. The data appears accurate; a production peak of 8.2 kilowatt hours (kwh) just before noon is entirely reasonable.
The nice thing about this is that you can easily pipe the data to gnuplot or any other program to create a nice chart.
About Enteros
Enteros offers a patented database performance management SaaS platform. It finds the root causes of complex database scalability and performance problems that affect business across a growing number of cloud, RDBMS, NoSQL, and machine learning database platforms.
The views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Enteros Inc. This blog may contain links to the content of third-party sites. By providing such links, Enteros Inc. does not adopt, guarantee, approve, or endorse the information, views, or products available on such sites.
Are you interested in writing for Enteros’ Blog? Please send us a pitch!
RELATED POSTS
How Can Enterprises Reduce Database Costs Without Sacrificing Performance?
- 11 September 2026
- Database Performance Management
Enterprises can reduce database costs without sacrificing performance by identifying inefficient SQL, right-sizing infrastructure, eliminating unused capacity, analyzing workload patterns, improving storage efficiency, and using database observability to connect resource consumption with application performance. Database cost optimization helps organizations control infrastructure spending while Enteros UpBeat provides performance intelligence, workload visibility, predictive analytics, and Cloud FinOps … Continue reading “How Can Enterprises Reduce Database Costs Without Sacrificing Performance?”
How Can AI Detect Database Performance Anomalies Before They Cause Downtime?
AI can detect database performance anomalies by continuously analyzing workload patterns, SQL behavior, latency, resource usage, waits, and historical baselines. AI database anomaly detection helps identify unusual behavior before it becomes a larger outage. With Enteros UpBeat, IT teams can detect emerging issues earlier, investigate root causes faster, and improve database reliability across complex enterprise … Continue reading “How Can AI Detect Database Performance Anomalies Before They Cause Downtime?”
How Can Financial Institutions Detect Database Bottlenecks Before Transaction Delays Occur?
- 10 September 2026
- Database Performance Management
Financial institutions can detect database bottlenecks before transaction delays occur by continuously monitoring query latency, database waits, CPU, memory, I/O, locking, workload changes, and transaction throughput. By combining performance baselines, anomaly detection, SQL intelligence, predictive analytics, and automated root cause analysis, teams can identify emerging issues early and optimize databases before customer-facing banking, payment, or … Continue reading “How Can Financial Institutions Detect Database Bottlenecks Before Transaction Delays Occur?”
What Role Does AI-Powered Database Monitoring for Banking Play in Performance Management?
AI-powered database monitoring for banking helps financial institutions detect anomalies, identify performance bottlenecks, analyse SQL workloads, predict capacity risks, and accelerate troubleshooting. By combining database observability with automated analysis, AI-powered database performance supports faster incident response, more reliable transactions, better resource utilisation, stronger capacity planning, and smarter cloud cost decisions across increasingly complex banking database … Continue reading “What Role Does AI-Powered Database Monitoring for Banking Play in Performance Management?”